A federal judge in California recently struck down a state law requiring background checks for ammunition purchases. Judge Roger Benitez issued a permanent injunction against enforcing the law, arguing that it violates the Second Amendment rights of California residents.

The controversial law was approved by voters in 2016 and later amended to require checks for each ammunition purchase. Supporters claimed background checks would reduce gun violence, but opponents argued they burdened law-abiding gun owners.

In his ruling, Judge Benitez stated the sweeping checks have “no historical pedigree” and go against traditions accepted by the Founding Fathers. He pointed to high rejection rates that prevent numerous citizens from legally buying ammunition.

California officials sharply criticized the decision. Governor Newsom accused the judge of putting politics and the gun lobby ahead of public safety. State Attorney General Bonta defended background checks as life-saving measures. They plan to appeal the injunction.

The ruling relies on a 2022 Supreme Court decision stating judges must evaluate whether firearms laws align with historic regulations. It marks a major victory for gun rights groups who challenged the law, like Olympic shooter Kim Rhode. But it deals a blow to California’s recent efforts to enact stricter gun control.

The case will likely make its way to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals next. But Judge Benitez’s injunction currently blocks enforcement of background check requirements for ammunition purchases. This ongoing legal battle underscores the divisive debate around balancing Second Amendment rights and public safety.

This ruling could have significant implications if it is upheld. It demonstrates federal courts may strike down firearm laws they deem too restrictive under the expanded interpretation of the Second Amendment. The injunction prevents California from enforcing a major gun control law at least temporarily. It will fuel further debate between gun rights advocates and those supporting stricter regulations.